TAMPA - Mathematically speaking, scoring 3.5 out of 5 is the same as receiving three
and a half stars on a five-star scale. But visually speaking, the numbers don鈥檛 add
up.
When it comes to enticing potential consumers to either click on an ad or buy a product,
formats matter. Shapes outweigh numbers in the online review ratings battle.
A new in the Journal of Marketing Research found that consumers view a 3.5-rated product to be higher 鈥� and better 鈥� when the
score is illustrated in shapes like stars, circles and bars, versus numbers.
鈥淪imply changing a rating鈥檚 format from numbers to stars increases the perception
of the rating as higher,鈥� said Carter Morgan, an assistant professor in the School of Marketing and Innovation in the Muma College of Business, who co-authored the study.
鈥淭his study sheds light on how small changes in the presentation of product ratings
can have significant effects on consumer behavior in the online marketplace,鈥� he said.
Morgan said this is the first research to compare the presentation of online ratings
across distinct formats.
Researchers found that consumers perceived numerical ratings in the 3.5-3.9 range
as lower than if that same rating were presented in stars due to left-digit anchoring.
Left-digit bias is a psychological phenomenon where people place more emphasis on
the leftmost digit. A consumer鈥檚 brain tends to process numbers digit by digit with
a focus on the left most digit when interpreting numbers.
For a rating of 3.5, consumers typically focus on the digit 3 instead of the full
number 3.5, therefore believing the rating to be lower than it is, Morgan said.
The study鈥檚 findings have practical implications for online retailers, marketing managers
and website designers and public policy makers.
Researchers recommend using stars, circles, or bars as opposed to numbers in product
ratings because shapes can boost a consumer鈥檚 likelihood of choosing a product, their
intent to buy it, and even their likelihood of clicking on related advertisements.
Consumer advocates and government agencies have pushed to increase transparency for
online ratings and reviews.
Public policy makers may want to consider standardizing rating formats so that customers
are not unintentionally biased in their decision-making, Morgan said.
The article titled, 鈥�,鈥� was accepted in March and has been published online for early access in the Journal of Marketing Research, a flagship academic journal in the marketing field and among the list of top 24
leading business journals compiled by the University of Texas at Dallas鈥� Naveen Jindal
School of Management.
Aside from Morgan, the article鈥檚 co-authors include Annika Abell and Marisabel Romero,
both from the University of Tennessee Knoxville. To read the article, go .